How old should a site be to start gaining rank?

**hcgroup** · 15 November 2017, 10:02 pm

Hi,

Thanks a lot for your comment and contribution.

Cheers!

Originally Posted by WagerX

Yes, I agree. The domain age, and registration period are negligible. I read a study in MOZ about that.

Here's a interestingarticle about the age of a link on an older domain.
https://moz.com/blog/age-of-site-and...teboard-friday
I think that might be mroeimportant than domain age on your site.

**Progger** · 16 November 2017, 12:30 am

Morning,

U should spend some time and read some informations about the last google updates,because u play with your page against and not with google.

And Domain age,dont matter...

**hcgroup** · 16 November 2017, 1:50 am

Hi, thanks for your comment but can you please make this phrase "u play with your page against and not with google" more clear?

I am not playing with my site. I have been making a lot of technical and content-related investment as you see. And I have been reading a lot for +14 years.

Thanks,

Originally Posted by Progger

Morning,

U should spend some time and read some informations about the last google updates,because u play with your page against and not with google.

And Domain age,dont matter...

**wonderpunter** · 16 November 2017, 3:58 am

As a native English speaker your content comes across as spun... it may pass copyscape but does it pass googles superior algorithm that can tell if its quality or spun? maybe even hand spun... an example ... (It is one of the widely played casino game in the United Kingdom) Who speaks like this? or (We offer a pleasant stay to all the readers and other players at our website) <<< is this a hotel? In a year and a half you should be ranking for some decent keywords but you're having trouble..

My guess is that it's too close to the other site and will need more than copyscape to get you out of the whole.. perhaps some real written unique content

**hcgroup** · 16 November 2017, 4:40 am

I see bro. Thanks a lot for your priceless recommendations. So you think that the content language quality is low. Right?

Can you recommend me a native writer to rewrite the whole site with proofreading at a good price then?

Thanks in advance.

Originally Posted by wonderpunter

As a native English speaker your content comes across as spun... it may pass copyscape but does it pass googles superior algorithm that can tell if its quality or spun? maybe even hand spun... an example ... (It is one of the widely played casino game in the United Kingdom) Who speaks like this? or (We offer a pleasant stay to all the readers and other players at our website) <<< is this a hotel? In a year and a half you should be ranking for some decent keywords but you're having trouble..

My guess is that it's too close to the other site and will need more than copyscape to get you out of the whole.. perhaps some real written unique content

**Progger** · 16 November 2017, 5:47 am

Originally Posted by hcgroup

I am not playing with my site. I have been making a lot of technical and content-related investment as you see. And I have been reading a lot for +14 years.

Make it self,and make it better...
Your Content is more than low quality,the Keyword Density is arround 10%~
Out and Deeplinks,far too many...
Players prefer to read more negative facts than positive about a casino,u know this ?

Regards

**WagerX** · 16 November 2017, 12:02 pm

Originally Posted by hcgroup

...
Let me repeat myself. All of the content on the site is 100% unique.
....

I like the design. I agree they look the same, but you are right. The content is the important part. There's nothing woring with using the same design with different content.

I hope you are doing well.

I think I would have gone in a different direction. I would have made another site with the same design, but for a different niche. If you are hosting the site on the same IP, and the domain names are similiar you might have some issues.
Google analyzes all of the sites using the same IP addy. If you have a hundred websites about "blue widgets" they factor that in in their SERPs. (ie. bluewidgets.com, blue-widgets.com, etc.. )

I could be wrong. Maybe original content is the only thing you need.

**hcgroup** · 16 November 2017, 1:38 pm

Hello WagerX,

First of all, let me kindly thank you for all of your warm and motivating words in your message besides to all offensive messages above!

I feel supported at least by a person who has cooperative approach

I am very well although there have been many negative messages in this thread because I trust in myself and efforts. I appreciate your friendly approach. I hope you are well, too.

Regarding your IP comment, I totally agree with you!

Take care and keep in touch, please. It feels more than good to know your kind of people still exists!

Originally Posted by WagerX

I like the design. I agree they look the same, but you are right. The content is the important part. There's nothing woring with using the same design with different content.

I hope you are doing well.

I think I would have gone in a different direction. I would have made another site with the same design, but for a different niche. If you are hosting the site on the same IP, and the domain names are similiar you might have some issues.
Google analyzes all of the sites using the same IP addy. If you have a hundred websites about "blue widgets" they factor that in in their SERPs. (ie. bluewidgets.com, blue-widgets.com, etc.. )

I could be wrong. Maybe original content is the only thing you need.

**hcgroup** · 16 November 2017, 1:40 pm

Isn't "more than low quality" phrase an exaggerated one? Come on. Please be a bit motivative.

I appreciate your approach if you recommend something. But this should not be the way you approach.

We are all here for sharing the useful knowledge.

Thanks a lot for your last sentence, anyway. I will take care of that in the reviews.

Thanks.

Originally Posted by Progger

Make it self,and make it better...
Your Content is more than low quality,the Keyword Density is arround 10%~
Out and Deeplinks,far too many...
Players prefer to read more negative facts than positive about a casino,u know this ?

Regards

**hcgroup** · 16 November 2017, 1:42 pm

Hello again dear valued mate,

Btw, I like your 3 sites (Live Roulette | Live bitcoin casino | Find the best live casinos at Betivity.com) as well.

They all look beautiful! WELL DONE dear mate!

Originally Posted by WagerX

I like the design. I agree they look the same, but you are right. The content is the important part. There's nothing woring with using the same design with different content.

I hope you are doing well.

I think I would have gone in a different direction. I would have made another site with the same design, but for a different niche. If you are hosting the site on the same IP, and the domain names are similiar you might have some issues.
Google analyzes all of the sites using the same IP addy. If you have a hundred websites about "blue widgets" they factor that in in their SERPs. (ie. bluewidgets.com, blue-widgets.com, etc.. )

I could be wrong. Maybe original content is the only thing you need.

**hcgroup** · 16 November 2017, 1:44 pm

Thanks a lot for your contribution but I do not agree with you regarding the content quality. There may be some parts to be rewritten but not the whole site.

Thanks anyway. I will consider the COOPERATIVE parts of your message!

Cheers!

Originally Posted by wonderpunter

As a native English speaker your content comes across as spun... it may pass copyscape but does it pass googles superior algorithm that can tell if its quality or spun? maybe even hand spun... an example ... (It is one of the widely played casino game in the United Kingdom) Who speaks like this? or (We offer a pleasant stay to all the readers and other players at our website) <<< is this a hotel? In a year and a half you should be ranking for some decent keywords but you're having trouble..

My guess is that it's too close to the other site and will need more than copyscape to get you out of the whole.. perhaps some real written unique content

**Progger** · 17 November 2017, 5:45 am

Originally Posted by WagerX

I think I would have gone in a different direction. I would have made another site with the same design, but for a different niche. If you are hosting the site on the same IP, and the domain names are similiar you might have some issues.
Google analyzes all of the sites using the same IP addy. If you have a hundred websites about "blue widgets" they factor that in in their SERPs. (ie.

Nonsense...is a old seo myth....

**hcgroup** · 17 November 2017, 6:07 am

I do not agree with you. It is not nonsense. I agree with WagerX. It is still valid and will be valid.

Thanks

Originally Posted by Progger

Nonsense...is a old seo myth....

**Triple7** · 17 November 2017, 6:17 am

Originally Posted by hcgroup

It is a paid theme. And my coder customized nearly everything. So it is a customized paid theme.

Let's not say "inspiration" but the methodology is the same for SEO.

Regarding the identical pages, it is all about SEO strategy. Same white-hat strategy on both sites with totally unique and completely different content.

Regarding some sub-titles, they are general terms for Q&A and H2 titles. They may be changed for more uniqueness.

The comparison results for both NZ pages is 3% similarity which means NZ page is 97% unique. You may check also: https://www.duplichecker.com/comparison

But if you compare the content of the hidden boxes and bullets, all of the content is unique. Right?

Thanks!

Well, I would keep with 'inspiration'. Examples I gave are technically unique content, but who-ever reads both pages, will see clearly that one page is written with an eye on the other page.

Technically it's all unique, but I stick with my view that one page is clearly made with having an eye on the other. But yes, with the idea to pass all checks to be unique enough.

https://demo.orange-themes.net/?theme=7205094 This is the theme, right?

**yeahfree** · 17 November 2017, 7:14 am

Originally Posted by Triple7

Well, I would keep with 'inspiration'. Examples I gave are technically unique content, but who-ever reads both pages, will see clearly that one page is written with an eye on the other page.

Technically it's all unique, but I stick with my view that one page is clearly made with having an eye on the other. But yes, with the idea to pass all checks to be unique enough.

https://demo.orange-themes.net/?theme=7205094 This is the theme, right?

i can imagine google is a whole step further than duplichecker or copyscape and the likes. for sure their thesaurus is a lot bigger than you can even imagine.

**hcgroup** · 17 November 2017, 11:20 pm

Hi Triple7,

Thanks a lot for your contribution.

Yes, that is the theme.

Cheers!

Originally Posted by Triple7

Well, I would keep with 'inspiration'. Examples I gave are technically unique content, but who-ever reads both pages, will see clearly that one page is written with an eye on the other page.

Technically it's all unique, but I stick with my view that one page is clearly made with having an eye on the other. But yes, with the idea to pass all checks to be unique enough.

https://demo.orange-themes.net/?theme=7205094 This is the theme, right?

**hcgroup** · 17 November 2017, 11:22 pm

I see. So you think that all of the high-ranking sites produce purely fresh content (especially news) and do not rewrite?

Is this the case?

Originally Posted by yeahfree

i can imagine google is a whole step further than duplichecker or copyscape and the likes. for sure their thesaurus is a lot bigger than you can even imagine.

**PROFRBcom** · 18 November 2017, 5:30 pm

Originally Posted by wonderpunter

As a native English speaker your content comes across as spun...

If it's anything like the posts ITT, then my guess is Google Translated text is being used :P

**Progger** · 18 November 2017, 5:57 pm

Originally Posted by PROFRBcom

If it's anything like the posts ITT, then my guess is Google Translated text is being used :P

Yes...

Content is from a Portuguese or Spanish page..

This method is not clever,because google crawl and translate the content,to deliver better search results.

**BettingFinder** · 18 November 2017, 9:10 pm

From my own experience, I can day that 1 have sites with 4 months raking very well and sites with 3 years ranking very bad. So? Depending on your SEO strategy, no only the domain age.

Thread: How old should a site be to start gaining rank?

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

The Following User Says Thank You to wonderpunter For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Progger For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to WagerX For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Progger For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Triple7 For This Useful Post:

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to yeahfree For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to PROFRBcom For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Progger For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to BettingFinder For This Useful Post:

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions